Disclosure guideline for Proprietary Products enforceable?

Posted in Wealth Headlines
Next Post
Previous Post

Update: July 6th 2017.  I am still trying to determine if this is mandatory and an enforceable statute.  It appears to be a ‘recommendation only’, based on the word ‘should’ contained within the Bulletin.

At the end of 2016, after receiving complaints from Canadian investors, the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA) issued the guideline below.  I’ve reached out to the MFDA to ascertain if this is enforceable and I have received no reply.  Other industry advocates ensure me that is not actionable.  Alas, Canadian investors will surprised when they redeem or attempt to transfer their securities.  The solution might be descriptive nomenclature, ‘in’ the product name, such as:

“Financial Giant Canadian Balanced Fund PropProd No-Xfer $$$DSC”  

so you can immediately understand the associated terms and conditions.  Similar to the Nutrition Labels, the external label should inform you as to what is inside, and associated with, the product.

 

BULLETIN #0709-M — 22 December, 2016

Member Information — For Distribution to Relevant Parties within your Firm

Transfers and Proprietary Investment Products

In 2016 the MFDA asked all Members who sell proprietary investment products whether they permit clients to transfer those investments in-kind to other registered dealers or if instead clients are required to redeem the positions and transfer in-cash.  Several Members stated that some or all of their proprietary mutual funds or other investment products are exclusively distributed by the Member and cannot be transferred in-kind.

The MFDA has received complaints from investors who were unaware that certain mutual funds could not be transferred to another dealer.  In some cases, these investors incurred redemption fees to redeem their securities.  There may also be tax consequences to a redemption and transfer in-cash versus a transfer-in-kind.

Where Members offer proprietary mutual funds or other investment products that cannot be transferred to other dealers, Members should, at a minimum, clearly disclose this to clients at account opening in their relationship disclosure document.   Where only certain specific funds or investment products cannot be transferred in-kind this should be specifically disclosed at the point of sale of the particular investment product.  In both instances, the disclosure should include a specific discussion of any potential fees or tax consequences that may result from a redemption and transfer in-cash.

Ken Woodard

Director, Communications & Membership Services

Link: MFDA Bulletin re: Transfers and Proprietary Investment Products